Content provided by Willo Products
Many correctional facilities across the country are facing issues with door and lock security on their cell doors. There seems to be a constant drip of news stories at both state and county levels where broken, vulnerable or malfunctioning locks result in escapes, attacks on other inmates or assaults and harm to staff. When facility administrators call for upgrades to the door and lock security, they’re often met with reluctance due to the price tag.
Decision-makers who are responsible for the budget may compare it to their own experience and have the instinct to treat it like a commercial or residential lock repair – quick, relatively inexpensive and straightforward. But decision-makers who rely on that assumption can be blindsided by the actual scale and cost of securing correctional environments.
In correctional facilities the stakes are higher, the materials more robust and the consequences of failure much more serious than in other areas where government leaders may have more experience. Locking systems in jails and prisons must be designed to withstand not only wear and tear, but also intentional tampering, violent abuse and high-frequency use. Addressing those challenges isn’t cheap – and shouldn’t be. It’s important for jail administrators or prison staff to articulate these differences and why upgrading safety and security in a correctional facility is more than just a typical commercial or residential lock upgrade.
Why ‘It’s just replacing a lock’ misses the bigger picture
In a typical building, a door lock might cost a few hundred dollars to replace. But in a jail or prison, that number can multiply quickly – not because of inflated pricing, but because the environment demands a vastly different solution. These facilities house individuals who, by the nature of their environment, will interact with doors and locks in ways that are far more aggressive and frequent than in any other setting. Plus, the costs to correct these issues may be much higher than the initial construction costs incurred when the facility was first built decades ago. As plans are made to address these problems, budget holders need to be educated on these points:
Many older facilities feature a narrow-jamb lock that mounts into a two-inch-wide door frame. This minimum-security lock is outdated and cannot withstand the abuse it gets in a maximum-security cell block. Willo designed the Wedge as a more secure surface-mounted lock pocket. Its unique features provide additional security without the need for disturbing existing construction.
Willo Products
- Tamper resistance: Residential locks are designed to deter casual intrusion. Correctional locks must actively resist repeated, forceful attempts at defeat from all angles, inside the cell and out.
- Heavy-duty hardware: Materials must survive physical abuse and resist manipulation attempts that are part of daily life in secure housing units. Locks that are built to last are manufactured with 10- or 12-gauge steel.
- Unique installation requirements: In many cases, replacing a lock means relocating inmates and working within restricted environments – all while maintaining strict safety protocols. This step can add significantly to project scope and cost.
- More aggressive inmate population: The residents in today’s correctional facilities are more aggressive, less attentive to authority and more violent than they were 20 years ago, requiring a different, more robust security solution. Simply installing the same model of lock that failed may not be the wisest choice. A higher-security, tamper-resistant locking system option will provide better value over time.
Additionally, when locks fail other parts of the infrastructure are also subject to abuse. Upgrading locks cannot be viewed in isolation. Doors and frames also sustain damage, and what begins as a “lock replacement” often entails a full-scale retrofitting project to address all the vulnerabilities in a cell.
A real-world example: Rutherford County, North Carolina
This played out recently in Rutherford County, North Carolina, where local leaders approved a $389,556 investment to upgrade the locking systems in the county jail.
According to detention staff, inmates had repeatedly attempted – and occasionally succeeded – in tearing off existing cell door locks. These breaches didn’t lead to escapes, but did allow inmates to enter other cells and initiate violent altercations. “Inmate fights happen multiple times each year,” said Sergeant Beth Sprouse. “And this can lead to real injuries, for the inmates and the officers. The jail can be a violent, dangerous place.”
The facility’s 72 cells will soon be outfitted with a new tamper-resistant locking system.
Rutherford County’s commissioners supported the measure unanimously after hearing directly from jail staff about the safety implications. “It will make it safer for the staff and the inmates,” Sprouse told the board.
The bigger picture: What facilities and funders must understand
Examples like Rutherford County highlight that the cost of security upgrades is not just about new locks. It’s about upgrading the safety and security profile of a facility. The financial conversation must go beyond purchase price to include why these upgrades, especially those with tamper-resistant capabilities, will provide a better return on investment. These locks are purpose-built to resist manipulation, prying and other common methods of defeat used within correctional facilities.
Tamper-resistant systems provide clear long-term financial advantages:
- Fewer incidents: A complete locking system reduces and protects against tampering and breaches, decreasing the potential for fights, injuries and staff interventions.
- Reduced maintenance: Durable systems last longer under constant use and abuse, lengthening the time these systems can be in service and reducing the ongoing maintenance costs.
- Improved morale and safety: Officers gain confidence knowing their environment is secure, which can reduce burnout and staff turnover.
In short, upgrading to tamper-resistant locks lowers a facility’s total cost of ownership – and its risk profile.
Communicating total value to budget holders
Jail administrators and prison officials must often convey these needs to boards, commissions and legislatures that are used to thinking in terms of noncorrectional environments. That’s where operational staff can follow the example from Rutherford County: Get the frontline staff in the conversation with budget holders, explain the operational and safety problems and tie the investment directly to safety improvement and liability reduction.
The key isn’t simply to explain what the upgrade costs but what failing to upgrade might cost later.
For more information, visit Willo Products.
