County jails carry a heavy load. They are responsible for both security and care, often with limited staff and constant pressure from courts, families and the public. Medical needs come without warning and behavioral health concerns surface daily. Staff need training, support and procedures they can count on.
Yet many jails are asked to provide these services with fragmented systems and minimal resources. A 2023 survey by the National Commission on Correctional Health Care found that nearly 60% of jails reported staffing shortages in medical and mental health positions, and more than half indicated difficulty coordinating care across providers. [1] A separate report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics showed that drug or alcohol intoxication was involved in over 85% of jail deaths within the first week of incarceration. [2] These findings reflect a deeper issue: counties are struggling to manage complex healthcare demands with systems that were not designed for the job.
| RELATED: The next evolution in inmate care is already here
Why patchwork systems create more problems
Some jails try to manage this by building their own system based on the cost of individual programs. They hire medical staff directly, bring in outside counselors, get training from a different group and figure out billing as they go. On paper, it seems manageable. In reality, it creates more work, more confusion and more exposure to lawsuits.
When a jail relies on several separate programs or contractors, leadership is left trying to connect the dots. Different vendors follow different procedures, and training may not match what staff actually see in housing units. Medical and behavioral health teams may not communicate well — or at all. This leads to missed details, gaps in care and added pressure on officers and supervisors.
Billing is often overlooked. When claims are not prepared accurately or consistently, the county may miss eligible reimbursements or face questions during audits [3]. Without structure, billing becomes reactive instead of reliable. These challenges build up until a serious incident, outside complaint or inspection brings them to the surface with no clear solutions.
What a full-service healthcare partner provides
A full-service healthcare partner takes on more than just staffing. It becomes part of the facility’s daily operation. Medical and behavioral health care, training, clinical oversight and billing are connected through one coordinated system. This improves communication, reduces delays and helps staff understand what to do and when. [4]
Clinical leadership should be built into the process. That means there is support when complex situations arise and consistency in how care is delivered and documented. Training is aligned with real facility needs and focuses on practical awareness, not theory. Staff are prepared to notice when something is off, respond appropriately and document their actions in a way that supports the facility’s procedures.
Billing is handled with care, using trained professionals who understand how to prepare and review claims correctly. That helps counties recover eligible costs and feel confident about the documentation behind each claim.
Why structure matters
Moving away from a patchwork model is not just about convenience. It is about strengthening the jail’s foundation. When healthcare, training and documentation follow the same process, the facility becomes more prepared, more consistent and more supported. [5] This creates benefits that matter:
- Clearer records
- Faster response to concerns
- Fewer breakdowns in communication
- Improved support for staff
- Less stress during external reviews [6]
This approach does not eliminate challenges, but it gives jails a stronger, more organized way to face them. With a full-service healthcare partner, jail leadership gains more than a vendor. They gain a partner in performance, professionalism and preparation.
Tactical takeaway
A structured, full-service healthcare partnership reduces risk, strengthens consistency and gives jail staff the support they need to manage complex demands effectively.
References
- National Commission on Correctional Health Care. (2023). Correctional Health Care Snapshot Survey Results.
- Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2021). Mortality in Local Jails, 2000–2019. U.S. Department of Justice.
- Baumrucker E. (2024). Medicaid and incarcerated individuals. Congressional Research Service.
- Martelle M, et al. (2015). Meaningful use of an electronic health record in the New York City jail system. American Journal of Public Health, 105(9), 1752–1754.
- MacDonald R, Parsons A, Venters HD. (2013). The triple aims of correctional health: patient safety, population health and human rights. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 24(3), 1226–1234.
- Glowa-Kollisch S, et al. (2014). Data-driven human rights: Using the electronic health record to promote human rights in jail. Health and Human Rights, 16(1), 157–165.
About the author
Spark Training is a nationally recognized center of excellence that sets the standard for training and compliance through high-quality programs and quality improvement. Spark Training was recently named Healthcare Training Company of the Year in the 2025 Innovation & Excellence Awards hosted by Corporate LiveWire Global.
