Researchers find psychopaths know right from wrong

After surveying 67 inmates, psychologists at the University of New Mexico have found that psychopaths know right from wrong but do not act on that knowledge


James Monteleone
Albuquerque Journal

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A study by University of New Mexico psychologists has found that psychopaths can differentiate between right and wrong, but they fail to weigh the difference when making decisions.

The findings were recently published in Psychological Science, a highly regarded national research journal in psychology.

To reach the conclusion, UNM researchers Elsa Ermer and Kent Kiehl surveyed 67 prison inmates. Although 1 percent of the population is classified as psychopathic, 20 percent of prison inmates fit the characterization.

Ermer and Kiehl tested logical reasoning to find that psychopaths struggle to understand the social contracts and personal risks that influence decisions on how to behave.

Average people who were tested understood the expected behavior when someone said, "If you borrow my car, then you have to refuel it." Psychopathic subjects, however, failed to connect that borrowing the car required action or compensation in response.

Psychopaths also demonstrated an inability to connect potential negative outcomes with risky situations, such as "If you work with tuberculosis patients, then you must wear a surgical mask."

The inability to make logical connections and correct behavioral responses in real-life situations could influence criminal behavior among psychopaths, Ermer said.

"I think it is significant because a lot of past research has found that psychopaths can give normal responses on answers to moral dilemmas or things like that where it's clear they know the right answer and can parrot the right answer, but it doesn't seem to affect their behavior," Ermer said. "... Here's an example where they do poorly, where they're asked to make an inference and they have difficulty doing that."

The research has been conducted over the past three months. Ermer declined to say whether the prisoners tested were in New Mexico, citing ethical research restrictions.

UNM research that is published in a recognized national journal reflects well on the university, Psychology Department Chair Jane Ellen Smith said.

"When (UNM research) appears in a really good journal, then we get very important recognition because it's obviously more difficult to get articles published in the top journals," Smith said. "That is a reflection not only on the researcher, but the environment. UNM is seen as an environment that supports good research."

Copyright 2010 Albuquerque Journal

Copyright © 2013 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy

Recommended for you

Join the discussion

Copyright © 2021 Corrections1. All rights reserved.