The Press-Republican, Plattsburgh, N.Y.
PLATTSBURGH, N.Y. — Several amendments have been proposed for the HALT Act, which strictly limits the amount of time inmates can spend in special housing units, that would “improve safety” for corrections staff and the incarcerated population across New York, if implemented.
The Department of Corrections and Community Supervision released the recommendations, put forth by the Humane Alternatives to Long-Term Solitary Confinement Committee, in a news release last week.
The HALT Act — Humane Alternatives to Long Term Incarceration — became a big topic of discussion after thousands of corrections officers held a wildcat strike in February, with many wanting it repealed. The HALT Committee was then formed in March of 2025, as part of a Memorandum of Agreement with the New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association , and began meeting to review the HALT Act in its current form.
Now, following months of review, the committee’s recommended amendments of the HALT Act are now as follows:
Deter specific serious offenses
DOCCS has experienced situations in which provisions of the HALT Act “limited the ability to utilize segregated confinement as a consequence for certain serious offenses, such as sexual harassment, lewd conduct, unhygienic acts (throwing blood, seminal fluid, urine, feces, or the contents of a toilet bowl onto staff), extortion (which contributes to gang violence), riot, and escape attempt,” the committee said in a news release.
“No person should have to endure these acts in their place of work or living space and more must be done to prevent and address this type of behavior.”
To address these issues, the committee recommends amending the current law to:
- Clarify that sexual harassment and lewd conduct constitute behaviors that are eligible for placement in segregated confinement.
- Add a new offense for conduct that is consistent with aggravated harassment of an employee (unhygienic acts), which is already defined in penal law.
- Address patterns of extortion in connection with a gang or criminal enterprise by clarifying that such behavior is eligible for segregated confinement.
- Reduce the subjectivity of standards that have limited the imposition of segregated confinement for participating in a riot, escape, or attempted escape, which will help prevent a potentially very serious incident from occurring.
“These changes better align the current serious offenses specifically enumerated in correction law with that of similar offenses contained within the penal law,” the press release said.
Ensure availability of protective custody
Provisions of the HALT Act prohibit placement of individuals in a special housing unit for protective custody.
“Although well-intentioned, these provisions restrict the Department’s ability to provide for immediate safety concerns, conduct adequate PC investigations, and make transports to suitable facilities,” the committee said.
“It has also resulted in the need for more transfers between facilities, which places additional stress on staffing and the incarcerated population.”
The committee recommends modifying the law to:
- Allow temporary placement in a special housing unit or residential rehabilitation unit for protective custody for up to three days when there is an unreasonable risk to safety and there is no other suitable alternative housing readily available at the facility and require access to seven hours of out-of-cell time, per the existing requirement in the law.
Deter recidivism
Currently, the committee said there are few deterrents for repeat offenses committed in disciplinary housing special housing unit or residential rehabilitation unit or non-confinable offenses committed in general population — misconduct that does not qualify for segregated confinement.
Members of the committee agreed that this contributes to “significant disorder in both settings as it disrupts critical programming and infringes on the liberty and movement of the broader incarcerated population.”
The committee recommends amending the law to:
- Grant DOCCS the flexibility, in cases where individuals commit repeat offenses in disciplinary housing, to provide the required four hours of out-of-cell time in a setting (therapeutic programming or recreation) that appropriately addresses the behavior without disruption to others.
- Allow placement in special housing unit or residential rehabilitation unit for up to 15 days for recidivist misconduct in general population, defined as no fewer than three occasions within the preceding 30 days, in cases where it has been determined that alternative interventions have failed, and the ongoing misbehavior creates an unreasonable risk to safety or disruption to the operation of the facility.
Account for fuller range of serious offenses
The Committee agreed certain provisions contained within the correction law limit the effectiveness of segregated confinement as a deterrent to serious antisocial and or violent behavior.
For example, to qualify for segregated confinement, an incarcerated individual must not only have committed an enumerated serious offense, but the Department must also show the act was “so heinous or destructive that placement of the individual in general population housing creates a significant risk of imminent serious physical injury to staff or other incarcerated persons and creates an unreasonable risk to the security of the facility,” the committee said. Further, the law fails to define “violent felony act.”
The committee said this prevents “several serious offenses” that are considered violent felony acts in penal law from being eligible for segregated confinement sanctions, either due to a lack of clarity in the law or due to confusing standards reliant on subjective criteria.
The committee recommends amending the law to:
- Provide greater flexibility to allow segregated confinement for committing an enumerated offense or an act that is “so heinous or destructive” and altering other language to make the law less reliant on subjective standards.
- Align the internal disciplinary system with the criminal charges in penal law by defining “violent felony act” as behavior consistent with a violent felony offense as defined in penal law.
Balance discipline with incentives and programming
Recognizing the need to engage the incarcerated population through positive programming, the committee took a balanced approach and included recommendations to not only “strengthen the disciplinary system,” but to also “incentivize good behavior and positive programming to preempt conduct that may result in discipline.”
The committee was unanimous in its agreement that when these critical reforms are paired with well crafted, tailored, and reasonable incentives, “DOCCS facilities will see an increase in pro-social, non-violent behavior amongst the population and increase the safety of facilities for all.”
The committee recommends amending existing law to:
- Modify existing positive incentive programs that currently have statutory eligibility requirements that preclude a significant portion of the population, regardless of their institutional adjustment, personal growth, accomplishments, and rehabilitation, from being able to access the benefits associated with the programs.
“These common-sense reforms will increase safety and security for all who live in, work at, and visit state correctional facilities,” the committee said.
“At the same time, these recommendations maintain the fundamental goals of the HALT Act and offer additional incentives for the population to engage in programming and avoid violent behavior.”
Committee
The committee’s proposed recommendations have been submitted to the State Legislature and Gov. Kathy Hochul’s office for additional review.
The committee is composed of representatives from DOCCS, the Office of Employee Relations, and the Division of Criminal Justice Services, and unions representing employees working in DOCCS correctional facilities – Civil Service Employees Association, Council 82, NYSCOPBA and Public Employees Federation.
According to the news release, HALT Committee members convened several times over the course of five months and met with several independent stakeholders to incorporate external viewpoints into deliberations.
These stakeholders include the Center for Community Alternatives , Correctional Association of New York , HALT Solitary Campaign, Legal Action Center, New York Civil Liberties Union , and Prisoners’ Legal Services of New York .
“The goal of the HALT Committee is to provide the legislature with recommendations to enhance safety for both our staff and the incarcerated, while maintaining the core principles and intent of the HALT Act,” DOCCS Commissioner Daniel F. Martuscello III said in a statement.
“We believe we have achieved this goal in a way that will ultimately lead to better outcomes and safer facilities. It is my hope that the legislature considers these changes as an important evolution of the HALT Act that reflects all we have learned since its inception in March 2022.”
—
© 2025 the Press-Republican (Plattsburgh, N.Y.). Visit pressrepublican.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
