Sheriff Joe loses re-election bid

While the sheriff never changed, the landscape around him slowly did


By Nigel Duara
Los Angeles Times

PHOENIX — The path he started on years ago led Joe Arpaio to a red-lit stage in July, his hand outstretched as thousands cheered “Trump! Trump! Trump!”

Never before had a presidential candidate so embraced the man who calls himself “America’s Toughest Sheriff,” a founding father of the strong-borders movement whose hardened views on immigration seemed to square perfectly with those of the Republican nominee. Donald Trump gave Arpaio a full five minutes in front of the Republican National Committee.

In this Jan. 9, 2013, file photo, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio speaks to reporters in Phoenix, Ariz.
In this Jan. 9, 2013, file photo, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio speaks to reporters in Phoenix, Ariz. (AP File Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

It was probably the last major national appearance of Arpaio’s political career.

While the sheriff never changed, the landscape around him slowly did, and Tuesday, his constituents — now younger and more Latino — voted him out of office, ending a six-term career as the sheriff of Maricopa County. In his place, Paul Penzone — a retired police officer — will be the top lawman of the state’s most populous county.

An epilogue awaits in December, when Arpaio faces trial on charges of criminal contempt over allegations that he ignored a court to stop his deputies from racial profiling.

Arpaio attracted national attention for housing inmates in canvas tents in the scorching Arizona heat and his tough talk on immigration. But when he first won election in 1992, the former Drug Enforcement Administration agent ran on a traditional platform — being tough on crime at a time it was increasing in the U.S. Within a decade, after writing an autobiography and winning re-elections by wide margins, Arpaio was considered a favorite as the Republican nominee for governor but chose not to run, instead supporting Democrat Janet Napolitano for the job.

In 2004, the Maricopa County Republican Party took its revenge, refusing to endorse Arpaio for sheriff. It was a lesson he would remember as he sought influence at the national level.

When Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas won election in 2004 promising to crack down on illegal immigration duting a burgeoning border crisis and drug cartel wars in Sonora, Mexico, Arpaio took notice. He would not need the county Republicans if he could expand his base nationally.

He did, by turning to the rest of the country for campaign donations. The result was a political fund that dwarfed those of his opponents.

Never a kingmaker, Arpaio had an unfortunate penchant for backing candidates at the wrong time. He endorsed Republican Mitt Romney for president in 2008 over his home state senator, John McCain, who won the nomination. In 2011, Arpaio gave his earliest endorsement to Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who was tumbling in the polls.

Never a graceful speaker, Arpaio instead intoned from the pulpit, index finger extended, in a deep baritone. But aided by a former TV reporter as his right hand, Arpaio developed a savvy press strategy with the understanding that good video will always get on the air, and live video will lead newscasts. So Arpaio gave the press good video, particularly if it involved armed agents busting drug-trafficking or human-smuggling operations.

The downside to his successes was the opposition he helped galvanize. It began with Mothers Against Arpaio, a group that focused on the sheriff’s treatment of inmates under his watch. His opponents have since spread to business groups, drug-reform advocates and an expanding Latino voter base that viewed Arpaio overwhelmingly unfavorably.

Before his current court troubles, he was used to defeating federal investigators. As recently as 2012, the Justice Department cleared Arpaio of wrongdoing in a four-year abuse-of-power investigation. But in U.S. District Judge G. Murray Snow, Arpaio met his match.

After reviewing Arpaio’s treatment of Latino drivers in stings, Snow deemed Arpaio’s application of justice as “unfair, partial, and inequitable.”

Bit by bit, Arpaio’s fellow strong-borders advocates fell away in the face of changing national attitudes toward immigrants and illegal immigration.

©2016 Los Angeles Times

Recommended for you

Copyright © 2022 Corrections1. All rights reserved.