The Virginian-Pilot
VIRGINIA — Chesapeake jail in- mates -- at least the ones deemed nonviolent -- tackle all sorts of maintenance jobs for the city on public property. From weed whacking to litter removal on public roads and highways, these inmates provide a low-cost option in beautification efforts.
Some officials, though, can get a little carried away when paying too much attention to the bottom line. Here’s one example: a proposal to use local inmates for tasks on private property in Chesapeake.
City Manager William Harrell and other officials know of dreck that needs to be cleaned up around Chesapeake. Much of the problem occurs at the homes of elderly or disabled residents or houses where owners have neglected their properties. Some involve community improvement projects. Jail inmates could do the job while earning credit for fines, fees and court costs. A win-win for everybody? Not necessarily.
Yes, inmates would be supervised by Sheriff’s Department deputies. The inmates would work only where property owners give written approval. But the potential for danger would be too high, especially where inmates come into contact with senior citizens.
Secondly, there is such a thing as the private sector. The city could contract with private maintenance firms, at reasonable rates, to clean up properties that have become unsightly. If the homeowner can afford the bill, he or she should pay. Why undercut companies that are trying to gain work, especially in such a tight economy?
Keeping Chesapeake beautiful is a desirable goal. But let the jail inmates stay on public property, and let private firms handle private property. That’s a real win-win.
Copyright 2009 Landmark Communications, Inc.